The Boogaloo Crews
Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? - Printable Version

+- The Boogaloo Crews (https://boogaloocrews.com)
+-- Forum: Boogaloo Central (https://boogaloocrews.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Boogaloo Donut (https://boogaloocrews.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+---- Forum: Discussion Table (https://boogaloocrews.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+---- Thread: Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? (/showthread.php?tid=1624)



Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? - ShineCero - 10-26-2018

Social Media, over the past few years, have exploded into becoming part of the daily lives of everyday people; but it seemingly became an toxic environment in certain aspects. Do you think social media has negatively skewed people's views, perspective and launched them into toxicity?


RE: Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? - ~ Z ~ - 10-26-2018

I have a mixed view of this topic. While I believe social media is good for a few things such as keeping up with family and friends, super quick links to articles and videos, and the occasional news update, it fails in many others. Social media, in my opinion, is a cesspool of misinformation, clickbait, and extreme bias.

Spreading false information is as easy as clicking a Like and a Share. Most people want their information fast and don't really do their research on the topic. They, for the most part, blindly believe whatever Social Media tells them because if enough people Like and agree with it, then it has to be true, Right? 

Wrong.

I feel like this is a major downside to Social media and it's only getting worse and worse. However, when the real truth gets leaked out, it gets leaked out fast, so it's a bit of a double whammy I guess...


RE: Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? - LoopyPanda - 10-26-2018

Technology is bad and Thomas Edison was a witch! WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY

Just kidding. 

Social Media is simply the byproduct of the internet age, and its algorithms are based on putting whatever gets likes easiest and fastest on your feed/timeline to get you to click it. There's niche apps and more general ones that have hundreds of communities within them. While I use it primarily for entertainment and browsing art at a glance (Twitter), the ability to keep your timeline clean can be limited by the features of the app itself. Twitter allows you to mute keywords, hashtags, people's accounts, and it will effectively filter them out for you so you needn't look at it. Blocking does the same. You can control what you watch, follow, and post, so it is extremely easy to keep yourself out of toxic communities within the app (or even delete the app if you don't find any reason to use it). In most cases, you wouldn't be aware of how many lunatic circles are out there if you aren't purposely searching for them yourself or the latest gossip/commentary youtube channel decided to cover the basics for you. But these loopholes have left admins of the websites to slack off on their jobs-- Twitter won't ban Neo-Nazis or TERFs, but will automatically shadowban you for making non-threatening joke posts to friends like "I'm gonna kill you [for posting this stupid picture of me]", or is extremely exploitable by spambots and people running malicious forms of gaining adsense revenue (Tumblr and the never-ending plight of bots).

I don't think social media is responsible for creating toxic communities, so much as providing a convenient way for a lot of people around the globe to gather; you just incidentally happen to come across a LOT more assholes on the internet than in real life and feel less inclined to behave introverted like when you interact with total strangers IRL. You can't pretend to be absolutely certain of how nice or terrible a total stranger is IRL either without them acting overtly like a jerk. The ability to be anonymous (mostly) makes people behave without a filter on the internet, so they are more outward with their toxicity.

It doesn't even matter if you got rid of every social media application on the market either! People would still create websites for discussing things or cater to toxic individuals (r/Incels made their own websites after getting the banhammer from reddit), gossip websites and news would still publish misinformation in addition to gossip magazines that exist in print, Trump will still call everything CNN covers as "fake news". It wouldn't make a difference other than probably slowing down the speed of how locals on twitter can make a recycled meme become unfunny again in the span of 8 hours.

The advent of smartphones and 4G Data with broadband Wifi becoming a staple of industrialized consumerism would be more directly responsible for creating "instant gratification" behavior in mainstream internet users of social media. Myspace and other defunct social media websites existed long before the iPhone and broadband. Most people with internet lived on dial-up until around the mid to late 2000s, but because of how slow most packages could be, we didn't sit there constantly refreshing the page because we knew it could be a while before anyone would like or reply to our post. Despite the illusion of everything becoming convenient, technology has not given us more free time by completing things faster and giving us information faster; in reality, it's only made capitalist societies become busier and more obsessed with productivity. Demand of higher productivity goes to more hours worked, which means less time for enjoying free time, going to overtime and lost days off as according to your boss.

When you're so stressed out about working a 9 to 5 or a 12 to closing with a 3 hour commute to and from your home (or being a college student), with a pile of laundry that needs to be done, houses and kitchens that need cleaning, or food that needs to be cooked (if you haven't forgotten to stock up your fridge with instant meals), you have a minimal amount of time to decompress. The solution? Scroll twitter on your phone and see what your friends are up to or what your favorite creators are shitposting about for a quick chuckle while you're in line for the grocery, maybe see Twitter News' stream for all the latest happenings, do a quick scroll of your timeline, and then close it after a good 5 or 10 minutes of shopping at the store or waiting to get home on the bus. We needn't kid ourselves trying to blame all this on social media when it was an inevitable outcome of innovative internet technology. Couple this with a general lack of critical thinking and inability to think for yourself, and you have a crowd of malleable people you can easily manipulate into becoming your personal in-group echo chamber.




tl;dr: No TLDR because that would negate my entire diatribe about instant gratification.


RE: Does Social Media has an negative impact on people? - Grey Star - 10-26-2018

You could probably run a scientific test showing time spent on social media increases unhappiness and acceptance of aggressive ideas.

But you could make an argument like Loopy's that social media is just a by-product of modern American life. And I'm more inclined to believe that the modern American worth ethic is responsible for unhappiness.